Dovekie 21 vs Stone Horse
How do the Dovekie 21 and Stone Horse compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dovekie 21 | Dovekie 21 | Stone Horse | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.4 ft6.53 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 18.3 ft5.59 m |
| Beam | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 7.1 ft2.16 m |
| Draft | 2.5 ft0.76 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 600 lb272 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Sail area | 143 ft²13.3 m² | 315 ft²29.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 32.16 | 18.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 39 | 326 |
| Comfort ratio | 3.8 | 25.8 |
| Capsize screening | 3.16 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.7 |
Dovekie 21 vs Stone Horse: the short version
- The Stone Horse is the larger boat at 23.3 ft7.11 m LOA versus 21.4 ft6.53 m for the Dovekie 21.
- The Stone Horse is heavier, displacing about 650% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Dovekie 21 carries the more powerful rig (32.2 vs 18.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Stone Horse scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Stone Horse rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 3.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.