Drascombe Lugger vs Drascombe Scaffie
How do the Drascombe Lugger and Drascombe Scaffie compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Drascombe Lugger 
Drascombe Scaffie | Drascombe Lugger | Drascombe Scaffie | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.71 m | 14.8 ft4.50 m |
| Waterline length | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 12.3 ft3.75 m |
| Beam | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 5.7 ft1.75 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 1.2 ft0.37 m |
| Displacement | 600 lb272 kg | 463 lb210 kg |
| Ballast | 100 lb45 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 132 ft²12.3 m² | 100 ft²9.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 29.69 | 26.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 88 | 111 |
| Comfort ratio | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.96 | 2.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 4.7 |
Drascombe Lugger vs Drascombe Scaffie: the short version
- The Drascombe Lugger is the larger boat at 18.8 ft5.71 m LOA versus 14.8 ft4.50 m for the Drascombe Scaffie.
- The Drascombe Lugger is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Drascombe Lugger carries the more powerful rig (29.7 vs 26.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Drascombe Scaffie scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Drascombe Lugger rates better for offshore work (2.96 vs 2.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.