Drascombe Lugger vs Hunter 19-1
How do the Drascombe Lugger and Hunter 19-1 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Drascombe Lugger | Hunter 19-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.71 m | 18.7 ft5.69 m |
| Waterline length | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 14.6 ft4.44 m |
| Beam | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 7.3 ft2.23 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 600 lb272 kg | 1,250 lb567 kg |
| Ballast | 100 lb45 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 132 ft²12.3 m² | 156 ft²14.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 29.69 | 21.51 |
| Displacement / Length | 88 | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | 5.1 | 8.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.96 | 2.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Drascombe Lugger vs Hunter 19-1: the short version
- The Drascombe Lugger and Hunter 19-1 are close in length (18.8 ft5.71 m vs 18.7 ft5.69 m ).
- The Hunter 19-1 is heavier, displacing about 108% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Drascombe Lugger carries the more powerful rig (29.7 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 19-1 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 19-1 rates better for offshore work (2.72 vs 2.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Drascombe Lugger