Drascombe Scaffie vs Skipjack 15
How do the Drascombe Scaffie and Skipjack 15 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Drascombe Scaffie | Drascombe Scaffie | Skipjack 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.8 ft4.50 m | 14.6 ft4.44 m |
| Waterline length | 12.3 ft3.75 m | —— |
| Beam | 5.7 ft1.75 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Draft | 1.2 ft0.37 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 463 lb210 kg | 340 lb154 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 100 ft²9.3 m² | 125 ft²11.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.73 | 41.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 111 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 5.3 | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.97 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.7 | — |
Drascombe Scaffie vs Skipjack 15: the short version
- The Drascombe Scaffie and Skipjack 15 are close in length (14.8 ft4.50 m vs 14.6 ft4.44 m ).
- The Drascombe Scaffie is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Skipjack 15 carries the more powerful rig (41.1 vs 26.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Drascombe Scaffie rates better for offshore work (2.97 vs 3.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.