DS-16 vs Leeward 16
How do the DS-16 and Leeward 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
DS-16 
Leeward 16 | DS-16 | Leeward 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Waterline length | 14.3 ft4.37 m | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 2.9 ft0.89 m |
| Displacement | 500 lb227 kg | 650 lb295 kg |
| Ballast | 135 lb61 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 155 ft²14.4 m² | 168 ft²15.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 39.37 | 35.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 76 | 86 |
| Comfort ratio | 4.8 | 5.7 |
| Capsize screening | 3.02 | 2.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.2 |
DS-16 vs Leeward 16: the short version
- The DS-16 and Leeward 16 are close in length (16.0 ft4.88 m vs 16.0 ft4.88 m ).
- The Leeward 16 is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the DS-16 carries the more powerful rig (39.4 vs 35.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Leeward 16 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Leeward 16 rates better for offshore work (2.89 vs 3.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.