DS-16 vs Martin 16
How do the DS-16 and Martin 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
DS-16 
Martin 16 | DS-16 | Martin 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Waterline length | 14.3 ft4.37 m | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.3 ft1.01 m |
| Displacement | 500 lb227 kg | 730 lb331 kg |
| Ballast | 135 lb61 kg | 330 lb150 kg |
| Sail area | 155 ft²14.4 m² | 100 ft²9.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 39.37 | 19.74 |
| Displacement / Length | 76 | 80 |
| Comfort ratio | 4.8 | 10.0 |
| Capsize screening | 3.02 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.4 |
DS-16 vs Martin 16: the short version
- The DS-16 and Martin 16 are close in length (16.0 ft4.88 m vs 16.0 ft4.88 m ).
- The Martin 16 is heavier, displacing about 46% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the DS-16 carries the more powerful rig (39.4 vs 19.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Martin 16 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Martin 16 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 3.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.