E-Scow vs Grampian 28
How do the E-Scow and Grampian 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
E-Scow 
Grampian 28 | E-Scow | Grampian 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 24.5 ft7.47 m |
| Beam | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Displacement | 965 lb438 kg | 6,900 lb3,130 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 3,060 lb1,388 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 384 ft²35.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 52.92 | 16.95 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 209 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 20.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.73 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.6 |
E-Scow vs Grampian 28: the short version
- The E-Scow and Grampian 28 are close in length (28.0 ft8.53 m vs 28.0 ft8.53 m ).
- The Grampian 28 is heavier, displacing about 615% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the E-Scow carries the more powerful rig (52.9 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Grampian 28 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.