E-Scow vs Sabre 28
How do the E-Scow and Sabre 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
E-Scow 
Sabre 28 | E-Scow | Sabre 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 22.8 ft6.96 m |
| Beam | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 965 lb438 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,900 lb1,315 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 393 ft²36.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 52.92 | 16.56 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 278 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 24.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.73 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.4 |
E-Scow vs Sabre 28: the short version
- The E-Scow and Sabre 28 are close in length (28.0 ft8.53 m vs 28.0 ft8.53 m ).
- The Sabre 28 is heavier, displacing about 667% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the E-Scow carries the more powerful rig (52.9 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sabre 28 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 2.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.