E-Scow vs X boat
How do the E-Scow and X boat compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
E-Scow 
X boat | E-Scow | X boat | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 14.5 ft4.42 m |
| Beam | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 6.1 ft1.85 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 2.6 ft0.79 m |
| Displacement | 965 lb438 kg | 470 lb213 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 110 ft²10.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 52.92 | 29.11 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 69 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 4.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.73 | 3.13 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.1 |
E-Scow vs X boat: the short version
- The E-Scow is the larger boat at 28.0 ft8.53 m LOA versus 16.0 ft4.88 m for the X boat.
- The E-Scow is heavier, displacing about 105% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the E-Scow carries the more powerful rig (52.9 vs 29.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the E-Scow rates better for offshore work (2.73 vs 3.13).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.