Eagle 38 vs Etap 39s
How do the Eagle 38 and Etap 39s compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Eagle 38 
Etap 39s | Eagle 38 | Etap 39s | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 38.6 ft11.77 m | 39.0 ft11.88 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 33.5 ft10.20 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.60 m | 12.6 ft3.85 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 6.4 ft1.95 m |
| Displacement | 8,378 lb3,800 kg | 14,991 lb6,800 kg |
| Ballast | 2,976 lb1,350 kg | 4,960 lb2,250 kg |
| Sail area | 644 ft²59.8 m² | 835 ft²77.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.98 | 21.97 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 179 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 22.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.68 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.8 |
Eagle 38 vs Etap 39s: the short version
- The Eagle 38 and Etap 39s are close in length (38.6 ft11.77 m vs 39.0 ft11.88 m ).
- The Etap 39s is heavier, displacing about 79% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Eagle 38 carries the more powerful rig (25.0 vs 22.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Eagle 38 rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.