Eastward Ho 24 vs Hunter 23.5
How do the Eastward Ho 24 and Hunter 23.5 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Eastward Ho 24 | Eastward Ho 24 | Hunter 23.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.7 ft7.21 m | 23.7 ft7.21 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 21.4 ft6.53 m |
| Beam | 8.7 ft2.64 m | 8.3 ft2.54 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 301 ft²28.0 m² | 237 ft²22.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.16 | 23.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 391 | 91 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.9 | 8.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.81 | 2.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.2 |
Eastward Ho 24 vs Hunter 23.5: the short version
- The Eastward Ho 24 and Hunter 23.5 are close in length (23.7 ft7.21 m vs 23.7 ft7.21 m ).
- The Eastward Ho 24 is heavier, displacing about 250% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 23.5 carries the more powerful rig (23.9 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Eastward Ho 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Eastward Ho 24 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.64).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.