Eastward Ho 24 vs Northern 1/4 Ton
How do the Eastward Ho 24 and Northern 1/4 Ton compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Eastward Ho 24 | Northern 1/4 Ton | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.7 ft7.21 m | 23.7 ft7.21 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 19.3 ft5.89 m |
| Beam | 8.7 ft2.64 m | 8.4 ft2.57 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 3,400 lb1,542 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 1,450 lb658 kg |
| Sail area | 301 ft²28.0 m² | 219 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.16 | 15.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 391 | 210 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.9 | 14.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.81 | 2.24 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.9 |
Eastward Ho 24 vs Northern 1/4 Ton: the short version
- The Eastward Ho 24 and Northern 1/4 Ton are close in length (23.7 ft7.21 m vs 23.7 ft7.21 m ).
- The Eastward Ho 24 is heavier, displacing about 106% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Northern 1/4 Ton carries the more powerful rig (15.5 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Eastward Ho 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Eastward Ho 24 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.24).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.