Edel 665 vs Johnson 23
How do the Edel 665 and Johnson 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Edel 665 
Johnson 23 | Edel 665 | Johnson 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 21.9 ft6.68 m |
| Waterline length | 18.2 ft5.55 m | 19.4 ft5.90 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft0.99 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 2,403 lb1,090 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Ballast | 882 lb400 kg | 1,411 lb640 kg |
| Sail area | 211 ft²19.6 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.82 | 23.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 178 | 176 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.6 | 13.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €4,500 |
Edel 665 vs Johnson 23: the short version
- The Edel 665 and Johnson 23 are close in length (21.8 ft6.65 m vs 21.9 ft6.68 m ).
- The Johnson 23 is heavier, displacing about 19% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Johnson 23 carries the more powerful rig (23.1 vs 18.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Johnson 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Johnson 23 rates better for offshore work (2.31 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.