Edel 820 vs Halman Horizon
How do the Edel 820 and Halman Horizon compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Edel 820 | Halman Horizon | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.9 ft8.21 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.95 m | 9.7 ft2.95 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 7,050 lb3,198 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 2,250 lb1,021 kg |
| Sail area | 386 ft²35.9 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 16.80 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 276 | 257 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 21.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Edel 820 vs Halman Horizon: the short version
- The Edel 820 and Halman Horizon are close in length (26.9 ft8.21 m vs 27.0 ft8.23 m ).
- The Edel 820 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Edel 820 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Edel 820
Halman Horizon