Edel 820 vs Hotfoot 27
How do the Edel 820 and Hotfoot 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Edel 820 
Hotfoot 27 | Edel 820 | Hotfoot 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.9 ft8.21 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.95 m | 9.3 ft2.84 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 7,050 lb3,198 kg | 3,600 lb1,633 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | 386 ft²35.9 m² | 347 ft²32.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.80 | 23.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 276 | 151 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 12.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.44 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.3 |
Edel 820 vs Hotfoot 27: the short version
- The Edel 820 and Hotfoot 27 are close in length (26.9 ft8.21 m vs 27.0 ft8.23 m ).
- The Edel 820 is heavier, displacing about 96% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hotfoot 27 carries the more powerful rig (23.6 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Edel 820 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Edel 820 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.