Edel 820 vs Stiletto 27
How do the Edel 820 and Stiletto 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Edel 820 
Stiletto 27 | Edel 820 | Stiletto 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.9 ft8.21 m | 26.8 ft8.18 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.95 m | 13.8 ft4.22 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 7,050 lb3,198 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 386 ft²35.9 m² | 336 ft²31.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.80 | 50.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 276 | 36 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 2.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 5.36 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.6 |
Edel 820 vs Stiletto 27: the short version
- The Edel 820 and Stiletto 27 are close in length (26.9 ft8.21 m vs 26.8 ft8.18 m ).
- The Edel 820 is heavier, displacing about 541% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Stiletto 27 carries the more powerful rig (50.5 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Edel 820 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Edel 820 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 5.36).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.