Elite 25 vs Ericson 25
How do the Elite 25 and Ericson 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Elite 25 | Elite 25 | Ericson 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.7 ft7.52 m | 24.7 ft7.52 m |
| Waterline length | 20.5 ft6.25 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.69 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 3.8 ft1.16 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 5,100 lb2,313 kg |
| Ballast | 1,430 lb649 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Sail area | 243 ft²22.6 m² | 265 ft²24.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.51 | 14.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 252 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.5 | 22.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.23 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.1 |
Elite 25 vs Ericson 25: the short version
- The Elite 25 and Ericson 25 are close in length (24.7 ft7.52 m vs 24.7 ft7.52 m ).
- The Ericson 25 is heavier, displacing about 29% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Elite 25 carries the more powerful rig (15.5 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 25 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.23).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.