Endeavour 33 vs Hobie 33
How do the Endeavour 33 and Hobie 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Endeavour 33 
Hobie 33 | Endeavour 33 | Hobie 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 30.5 ft9.30 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 11,350 lb5,148 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Ballast | 4,600 lb2,087 kg | 1,900 lb862 kg |
| Sail area | 539 ft²50.1 m² | 429 ft²39.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.08 | 27.24 |
| Displacement / Length | 244 | 63 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.3 | 12.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.05 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.4 |
Endeavour 33 vs Hobie 33: the short version
- The Endeavour 33 and Hobie 33 are close in length (33.0 ft10.06 m vs 33.0 ft10.06 m ).
- The Endeavour 33 is heavier, displacing about 184% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hobie 33 carries the more powerful rig (27.2 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Endeavour 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hobie 33 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.