Endeavour 33 vs Newport 33
How do the Endeavour 33 and Newport 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Endeavour 33 
Newport 33 | Endeavour 33 | Newport 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 11,350 lb5,148 kg | 9,500 lb4,309 kg |
| Ballast | 4,600 lb2,087 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 539 ft²50.1 m² | 465 ft²43.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.08 | 16.59 |
| Displacement / Length | 244 | 215 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.3 | 21.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.05 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Endeavour 33 vs Newport 33: the short version
- The Endeavour 33 and Newport 33 are close in length (33.0 ft10.06 m vs 33.0 ft10.06 m ).
- The Endeavour 33 is heavier, displacing about 19% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Endeavour 33 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Endeavour 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Newport 33 rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.