Endeavour 33 vs Nova 33
How do the Endeavour 33 and Nova 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Endeavour 33 
Nova 33 | Endeavour 33 | Nova 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 11,350 lb5,148 kg | 8,177 lb3,709 kg |
| Ballast | 4,600 lb2,087 kg | 3,868 lb1,754 kg |
| Sail area | 539 ft²50.1 m² | 493 ft²45.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.08 | 19.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 244 | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.3 | 19.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.05 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 6.9 |
Endeavour 33 vs Nova 33: the short version
- The Endeavour 33 and Nova 33 are close in length (33.0 ft10.06 m vs 33.0 ft10.06 m ).
- The Endeavour 33 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nova 33 carries the more powerful rig (19.4 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Endeavour 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Endeavour 33 rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.