Endeavour 37 vs Hunter 37.5 Legend
How do the Endeavour 37 and Hunter 37.5 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Endeavour 37 | Endeavour 37 | Hunter 37.5 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 31.8 ft9.68 m |
| Beam | 11.6 ft3.53 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 20,000 lb9,072 kg | 16,400 lb7,439 kg |
| Ballast | 8,000 lb3,629 kg | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Sail area | 575 ft²53.4 m² | 704 ft²65.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 12.49 | 17.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 331 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.9 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.6 |
Endeavour 37 vs Hunter 37.5 Legend: the short version
- The Endeavour 37 and Hunter 37.5 Legend are close in length (37.0 ft11.28 m vs 37.0 ft11.28 m ).
- The Endeavour 37 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 37.5 Legend carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 12.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Endeavour 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Endeavour 37 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.