Endeavour 37 vs Ranger 37
How do the Endeavour 37 and Ranger 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Endeavour 37 | Endeavour 37 | Ranger 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 28.3 ft8.63 m |
| Beam | 11.6 ft3.53 m | 11.3 ft3.45 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 20,000 lb9,072 kg | 15,200 lb6,895 kg |
| Ballast | 8,000 lb3,629 kg | 7,300 lb3,311 kg |
| Sail area | 575 ft²53.4 m² | 629 ft²58.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 12.49 | 16.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 331 | 298 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.9 | 30.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 1.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.1 |
Endeavour 37 vs Ranger 37: the short version
- The Endeavour 37 and Ranger 37 are close in length (37.0 ft11.28 m vs 37.0 ft11.28 m ).
- The Endeavour 37 is heavier, displacing about 32% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ranger 37 carries the more powerful rig (16.4 vs 12.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Endeavour 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Endeavour 37 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 1.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.