Endeavour 37 vs Swan 37
How do the Endeavour 37 and Swan 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Endeavour 37 
Swan 37 | Endeavour 37 | Swan 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 11.6 ft3.53 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 6.4 ft1.95 m |
| Displacement | 20,000 lb9,072 kg | 15,400 lb6,985 kg |
| Ballast | 8,000 lb3,629 kg | 7,300 lb3,311 kg |
| Sail area | 575 ft²53.4 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 12.49 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 331 | 349 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.9 | 36.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 1.61 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.0 |
Endeavour 37 vs Swan 37: the short version
- The Endeavour 37 and Swan 37 are close in length (37.0 ft11.28 m vs 37.0 ft11.28 m ).
- The Endeavour 37 is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 37 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 1.71).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.