Ericson 23-1 vs Ericson 29
How do the Ericson 23-1 and Ericson 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ericson 23-1 
Ericson 29 | Ericson 23-1 | Ericson 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.6 ft6.88 m | 28.6 ft8.71 m |
| Waterline length | 19.2 ft5.84 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.29 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 2,700 lb1,225 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Ballast | 1,300 lb590 kg | 3,900 lb1,769 kg |
| Sail area | 215 ft²20.0 m² | 407 ft²37.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.74 | 15.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 171 | 356 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.1 | 28.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.15 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Ericson 23-1 vs Ericson 29: the short version
- The Ericson 29 is the larger boat at 28.6 ft8.71 m LOA versus 22.6 ft6.88 m for the Ericson 23-1.
- The Ericson 29 is heavier, displacing about 215% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ericson 23-1 carries the more powerful rig (17.7 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 29 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.15).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.