Ericson 23-1 vs Monark 700
How do the Ericson 23-1 and Monark 700 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ericson 23-1 | Ericson 23-1 | Monark 700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.6 ft6.88 m | 22.6 ft6.90 m |
| Waterline length | 19.2 ft5.84 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.29 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 2,700 lb1,225 kg | 3,086 lb1,400 kg |
| Ballast | 1,300 lb590 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Sail area | 215 ft²20.0 m² | 231 ft²21.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.74 | 17.44 |
| Displacement / Length | 171 | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.1 | 14.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.15 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €4,500 |
Ericson 23-1 vs Monark 700: the short version
- The Ericson 23-1 and Monark 700 are close in length (22.6 ft6.88 m vs 22.6 ft6.90 m ).
- The Monark 700 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ericson 23-1 carries the more powerful rig (17.7 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 23-1 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 23-1 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.