Ericson 23-2 vs Ericson 25
How do the Ericson 23-2 and Ericson 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ericson 23-2 | Ericson 23-2 | Ericson 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.9 ft6.99 m | 24.7 ft7.52 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 3.8 ft1.16 m |
| Displacement | 3,100 lb1,406 kg | 5,100 lb2,313 kg |
| Ballast | 1,200 lb544 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Sail area | 242 ft²22.5 m² | 265 ft²24.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.21 | 14.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 187 | 252 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.8 | 22.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.1 |
Ericson 23-2 vs Ericson 25: the short version
- The Ericson 25 is the larger boat at 24.7 ft7.52 m LOA versus 22.9 ft6.99 m for the Ericson 23-2.
- The Ericson 25 is heavier, displacing about 65% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ericson 23-2 carries the more powerful rig (18.2 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 25 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.