Ericson 23-2 vs Ericson 29
How do the Ericson 23-2 and Ericson 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ericson 23-2 
Ericson 29 | Ericson 23-2 | Ericson 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.9 ft6.99 m | 28.6 ft8.71 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 3,100 lb1,406 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Ballast | 1,200 lb544 kg | 3,900 lb1,769 kg |
| Sail area | 242 ft²22.5 m² | 407 ft²37.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.21 | 15.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 187 | 356 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.8 | 28.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Ericson 23-2 vs Ericson 29: the short version
- The Ericson 29 is the larger boat at 28.6 ft8.71 m LOA versus 22.9 ft6.99 m for the Ericson 23-2.
- The Ericson 29 is heavier, displacing about 174% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ericson 23-2 carries the more powerful rig (18.2 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 29 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.