Ericson 23-2 vs Ericson 36
How do the Ericson 23-2 and Ericson 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ericson 23-2 | Ericson 23-2 | Ericson 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.9 ft6.99 m | 35.6 ft10.84 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 11.8 ft3.61 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Displacement | 3,100 lb1,406 kg | 11,600 lb5,262 kg |
| Ballast | 1,200 lb544 kg | 5,230 lb2,372 kg |
| Sail area | 242 ft²22.5 m² | 598 ft²55.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.21 | 18.67 |
| Displacement / Length | 187 | 212 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.8 | 21.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 7.2 |
Ericson 23-2 vs Ericson 36: the short version
- The Ericson 36 is the larger boat at 35.6 ft10.84 m LOA versus 22.9 ft6.99 m for the Ericson 23-2.
- The Ericson 36 is heavier, displacing about 274% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ericson 36 carries the more powerful rig (18.7 vs 18.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 36 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.