Ericson 23-2 vs Farrier F-22
How do the Ericson 23-2 and Farrier F-22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ericson 23-2 
Farrier F-22 | Ericson 23-2 | Farrier F-22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.9 ft6.99 m | 22.9 ft6.99 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 18.1 ft5.51 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 3,100 lb1,406 kg | 1,300 lb590 kg |
| Ballast | 1,200 lb544 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 242 ft²22.5 m² | 328 ft²30.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.21 | 44.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 187 | 53 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.8 | 1.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 6.63 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.3 |
Ericson 23-2 vs Farrier F-22: the short version
- The Ericson 23-2 and Farrier F-22 are close in length (22.9 ft6.99 m vs 22.9 ft6.99 m ).
- The Ericson 23-2 is heavier, displacing about 138% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Farrier F-22 carries the more powerful rig (44.1 vs 18.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 23-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 23-2 rates better for offshore work (2.17 vs 6.63).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.