Ericson 25 vs Ericson 29
How do the Ericson 25 and Ericson 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ericson 25 
Ericson 29 | Ericson 25 | Ericson 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.7 ft7.52 m | 28.6 ft8.71 m |
| Waterline length | 20.8 ft6.35 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.16 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 5,100 lb2,313 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Ballast | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 3,900 lb1,769 kg |
| Sail area | 265 ft²24.6 m² | 407 ft²37.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.31 | 15.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 252 | 356 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.5 | 28.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.3 |
Ericson 25 vs Ericson 29: the short version
- The Ericson 29 is the larger boat at 28.6 ft8.71 m LOA versus 24.7 ft7.52 m for the Ericson 25.
- The Ericson 29 is heavier, displacing about 67% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ericson 29 carries the more powerful rig (15.6 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 29 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 1.86).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.