Ericson 25 vs Ericson 36
How do the Ericson 25 and Ericson 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ericson 25 | Ericson 25 | Ericson 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.7 ft7.52 m | 35.6 ft10.84 m |
| Waterline length | 20.8 ft6.35 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 11.8 ft3.61 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.16 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Displacement | 5,100 lb2,313 kg | 11,600 lb5,262 kg |
| Ballast | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 5,230 lb2,372 kg |
| Sail area | 265 ft²24.6 m² | 598 ft²55.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.31 | 18.67 |
| Displacement / Length | 252 | 212 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.5 | 21.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 7.2 |
Ericson 25 vs Ericson 36: the short version
- The Ericson 36 is the larger boat at 35.6 ft10.84 m LOA versus 24.7 ft7.52 m for the Ericson 25.
- The Ericson 36 is heavier, displacing about 127% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ericson 36 carries the more powerful rig (18.7 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 25 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.