Etap 20 vs Etap 23il
How do the Etap 20 and Etap 23il compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 20 | Etap 20 | Etap 23il | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.9 ft6.05 m | 25.5 ft7.77 m |
| Waterline length | 17.1 ft5.20 m | 20.3 ft6.19 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.14 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Displacement | 1,874 lb850 kg | 3,420 lb1,551 kg |
| Ballast | 441 lb200 kg | 1,035 lb469 kg |
| Sail area | 187 ft²17.4 m² | 213 ft²19.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.68 | 15.01 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 182 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.9 | 14.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 2.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 6.0 |
Etap 20 vs Etap 23il: the short version
- The Etap 23il is the larger boat at 25.5 ft7.77 m LOA versus 19.9 ft6.05 m for the Etap 20.
- The Etap 23il is heavier, displacing about 82% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 20 carries the more powerful rig (19.7 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 23il scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 23il rates better for offshore work (2.17 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.