Etap 20 vs Etap 26
How do the Etap 20 and Etap 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 20 | Etap 20 | Etap 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.9 ft6.05 m | 25.8 ft7.85 m |
| Waterline length | 17.1 ft5.20 m | 21.6 ft6.60 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 9.0 ft2.75 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.14 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 1,874 lb850 kg | 5,084 lb2,306 kg |
| Ballast | 441 lb200 kg | 1,568 lb711 kg |
| Sail area | 187 ft²17.4 m² | 286 ft²26.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.68 | 15.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 224 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.9 | 18.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 6.2 |
Etap 20 vs Etap 26: the short version
- The Etap 26 is the larger boat at 25.8 ft7.85 m LOA versus 19.9 ft6.05 m for the Etap 20.
- The Etap 26 is heavier, displacing about 171% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 20 carries the more powerful rig (19.7 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 26 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.