Etap 20 vs Etap 30
How do the Etap 20 and Etap 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 20 | Etap 20 | Etap 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.9 ft6.05 m | 29.6 ft9.02 m |
| Waterline length | 17.1 ft5.20 m | 25.1 ft7.64 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.14 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 1,874 lb850 kg | 7,940 lb3,602 kg |
| Ballast | 441 lb200 kg | 3,032 lb1,375 kg |
| Sail area | 187 ft²17.4 m² | 548 ft²50.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.68 | 22.03 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 225 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.9 | 20.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 6.7 |
Etap 20 vs Etap 30: the short version
- The Etap 30 is the larger boat at 29.6 ft9.02 m LOA versus 19.9 ft6.05 m for the Etap 20.
- The Etap 30 is heavier, displacing about 324% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 30 carries the more powerful rig (22.0 vs 19.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 30 rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.