Etap 20 vs Etap 32i
How do the Etap 20 and Etap 32i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 20 | Etap 20 | Etap 32i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.9 ft6.05 m | 30.7 ft9.35 m |
| Waterline length | 17.1 ft5.20 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 11.2 ft3.42 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.14 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 1,874 lb850 kg | 9,763 lb4,428 kg |
| Ballast | 441 lb200 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Sail area | 187 ft²17.4 m² | 588 ft²54.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.68 | 20.60 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 241 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.9 | 21.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 6.9 |
Etap 20 vs Etap 32i: the short version
- The Etap 32i is the larger boat at 30.7 ft9.35 m LOA versus 19.9 ft6.05 m for the Etap 20.
- The Etap 32i is heavier, displacing about 421% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 32i carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 19.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 32i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 32i rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.