Etap 20 vs Etap 35i
How do the Etap 20 and Etap 35i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 20 | Etap 20 | Etap 35i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.9 ft6.05 m | 34.8 ft10.62 m |
| Waterline length | 17.1 ft5.20 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.14 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 1,874 lb850 kg | 11,464 lb5,200 kg |
| Ballast | 441 lb200 kg | 3,836 lb1,740 kg |
| Sail area | 187 ft²17.4 m² | 504 ft²46.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.68 | 15.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 210 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.9 | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 7.2 |
Etap 20 vs Etap 35i: the short version
- The Etap 35i is the larger boat at 34.8 ft10.62 m LOA versus 19.9 ft6.05 m for the Etap 20.
- The Etap 35i is heavier, displacing about 512% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 20 carries the more powerful rig (19.7 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 35i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 35i rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.