Etap 20 vs Flying Dutchman
How do the Etap 20 and Flying Dutchman compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 20 
Flying Dutchman | Etap 20 | Flying Dutchman | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.9 ft6.05 m | 19.9 ft6.06 m |
| Waterline length | 17.1 ft5.20 m | 18.0 ft5.50 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.14 m | 3.7 ft1.12 m |
| Displacement | 1,874 lb850 kg | 364 lb165 kg |
| Ballast | 441 lb200 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 187 ft²17.4 m² | 183 ft²17.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.68 | 57.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 28 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.9 | 2.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.45 | 3.27 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.7 |
Etap 20 vs Flying Dutchman: the short version
- The Etap 20 and Flying Dutchman are close in length (19.9 ft6.05 m vs 19.9 ft6.06 m ).
- The Etap 20 is heavier, displacing about 415% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Dutchman carries the more powerful rig (57.4 vs 19.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 20 rates better for offshore work (2.45 vs 3.27).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.