Etap 21i vs Etap 32i
How do the Etap 21i and Etap 32i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 21i | Etap 21i | Etap 32i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.5 ft6.56 m | 30.7 ft9.35 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 11.2 ft3.42 m |
| Draft | 2.3 ft0.70 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 2,712 lb1,230 kg | 9,763 lb4,428 kg |
| Ballast | 772 lb350 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Sail area | 257 ft²23.9 m² | 588 ft²54.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.14 | 20.60 |
| Displacement / Length | 151 | 241 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.5 | 21.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.34 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.9 |
Etap 21i vs Etap 32i: the short version
- The Etap 32i is the larger boat at 30.7 ft9.35 m LOA versus 21.5 ft6.56 m for the Etap 21i.
- The Etap 32i is heavier, displacing about 260% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 21i carries the more powerful rig (21.1 vs 20.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 32i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 32i rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.