Etap 21i vs Spindrift 22
How do the Etap 21i and Spindrift 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 21i 
Spindrift 22 | Etap 21i | Spindrift 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.5 ft6.56 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 19.1 ft5.82 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 2.3 ft0.70 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 2,712 lb1,230 kg | 1,990 lb903 kg |
| Ballast | 772 lb350 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Sail area | 257 ft²23.9 m² | 194 ft²18.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.14 | 19.62 |
| Displacement / Length | 151 | 128 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.5 | 9.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.34 | 2.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.9 |
Etap 21i vs Spindrift 22: the short version
- The Etap 21i and Spindrift 22 are close in length (21.5 ft6.56 m vs 21.5 ft6.55 m ).
- The Etap 21i is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 21i carries the more powerful rig (21.1 vs 19.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 21i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 21i rates better for offshore work (2.34 vs 2.59).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.