Etap 22 vs Etap 26
How do the Etap 22 and Etap 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22 | Etap 22 | Etap 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.6 ft6.60 m | 25.8 ft7.85 m |
| Waterline length | 18.7 ft5.70 m | 21.6 ft6.60 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.40 m | 9.0 ft2.75 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 2,756 lb1,250 kg | 5,084 lb2,306 kg |
| Ballast | 1,213 lb550 kg | 1,568 lb711 kg |
| Sail area | 215 ft²20.0 m² | 286 ft²26.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.50 | 15.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 188 | 224 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.9 | 18.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.25 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.2 |
Etap 22 vs Etap 26: the short version
- The Etap 26 is the larger boat at 25.8 ft7.85 m LOA versus 21.6 ft6.60 m for the Etap 22.
- The Etap 26 is heavier, displacing about 84% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 22 carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 26 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.