Etap 22 vs Etap 28i
How do the Etap 22 and Etap 28i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22 | Etap 22 | Etap 28i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.6 ft6.60 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Waterline length | 18.7 ft5.70 m | 23.8 ft7.25 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.40 m | 10.3 ft3.12 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,756 lb1,250 kg | 6,173 lb2,800 kg |
| Ballast | 1,213 lb550 kg | 1,808 lb820 kg |
| Sail area | 215 ft²20.0 m² | 386 ft²35.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.50 | 18.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 188 | 205 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.9 | 17.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.25 | 2.24 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.5 |
Etap 22 vs Etap 28i: the short version
- The Etap 28i is the larger boat at 28.0 ft8.53 m LOA versus 21.6 ft6.60 m for the Etap 22.
- The Etap 28i is heavier, displacing about 124% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 28i carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 28i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 28i rates better for offshore work (2.24 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.