Etap 22 vs Etap 30
How do the Etap 22 and Etap 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22 | Etap 22 | Etap 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.6 ft6.60 m | 29.6 ft9.02 m |
| Waterline length | 18.7 ft5.70 m | 25.1 ft7.64 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.40 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 2,756 lb1,250 kg | 7,940 lb3,602 kg |
| Ballast | 1,213 lb550 kg | 3,032 lb1,375 kg |
| Sail area | 215 ft²20.0 m² | 548 ft²50.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.50 | 22.03 |
| Displacement / Length | 188 | 225 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.9 | 20.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.25 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.7 |
Etap 22 vs Etap 30: the short version
- The Etap 30 is the larger boat at 29.6 ft9.02 m LOA versus 21.6 ft6.60 m for the Etap 22.
- The Etap 30 is heavier, displacing about 188% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 30 carries the more powerful rig (22.0 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 30 rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.