Etap 22 vs Fabola Campus 650
How do the Etap 22 and Fabola Campus 650 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22 | Etap 22 | Fabola Campus 650 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.6 ft6.60 m | 21.6 ft6.60 m |
| Waterline length | 18.7 ft5.70 m | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.40 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 0.6 ft0.18 m |
| Displacement | 2,756 lb1,250 kg | 1,279 lb580 kg |
| Ballast | 1,213 lb550 kg | 132 lb60 kg |
| Sail area | 215 ft²20.0 m² | 248 ft²23.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.50 | 33.68 |
| Displacement / Length | 188 | 68 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.9 | 6.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.25 | 2.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €5,700 |
Etap 22 vs Fabola Campus 650: the short version
- The Etap 22 and Fabola Campus 650 are close in length (21.6 ft6.60 m vs 21.6 ft6.60 m ).
- The Etap 22 is heavier, displacing about 115% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fabola Campus 650 carries the more powerful rig (33.7 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 22 rates better for offshore work (2.25 vs 2.66).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.