Etap 22i vs Etap 32i
How do the Etap 22i and Etap 32i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22i | Etap 22i | Etap 32i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 30.7 ft9.35 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.47 m | 11.2 ft3.42 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 2,149 lb975 kg | 9,763 lb4,428 kg |
| Ballast | 518 lb235 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 588 ft²54.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.58 | 20.60 |
| Displacement / Length | 163 | 241 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 21.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 6.9 |
Etap 22i vs Etap 32i: the short version
- The Etap 32i is the larger boat at 30.7 ft9.35 m LOA versus 22.2 ft6.78 m for the Etap 22i.
- The Etap 32i is heavier, displacing about 354% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 32i carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 17.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 32i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 32i rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.