Etap 22i vs Etap 35i
How do the Etap 22i and Etap 35i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22i | Etap 22i | Etap 35i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 34.8 ft10.62 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.47 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 2,149 lb975 kg | 11,464 lb5,200 kg |
| Ballast | 518 lb235 kg | 3,836 lb1,740 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 504 ft²46.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.58 | 15.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 163 | 210 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 7.2 |
Etap 22i vs Etap 35i: the short version
- The Etap 35i is the larger boat at 34.8 ft10.62 m LOA versus 22.2 ft6.78 m for the Etap 22i.
- The Etap 35i is heavier, displacing about 433% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 22i carries the more powerful rig (17.6 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 35i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 35i rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.