Etap 22i vs Etap 38i
How do the Etap 22i and Etap 38i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22i | Etap 22i | Etap 38i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 38.0 ft11.57 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 32.0 ft9.74 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.47 m | 12.7 ft3.87 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 2,149 lb975 kg | 14,120 lb6,405 kg |
| Ballast | 518 lb235 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 599 ft²55.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.58 | 16.41 |
| Displacement / Length | 163 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 21.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 7.6 |
Etap 22i vs Etap 38i: the short version
- The Etap 38i is the larger boat at 38.0 ft11.57 m LOA versus 22.2 ft6.78 m for the Etap 22i.
- The Etap 38i is heavier, displacing about 557% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 22i carries the more powerful rig (17.6 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 38i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 38i rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.