Etap 22i vs Marshall 22
How do the Etap 22i and Marshall 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22i 
Marshall 22 | Etap 22i | Marshall 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.2 ft6.76 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.47 m | 10.2 ft3.10 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 2,149 lb975 kg | 5,660 lb2,567 kg |
| Ballast | 518 lb235 kg | 850 lb386 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 17.58 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 163 | 260 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 18.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 6.2 |
Etap 22i vs Marshall 22: the short version
- The Etap 22i and Marshall 22 are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.2 ft6.76 m ).
- The Marshall 22 is heavier, displacing about 163% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Marshall 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marshall 22 rates better for offshore work (2.28 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.