Etap 22i vs Maxi 68
How do the Etap 22i and Maxi 68 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22i | Etap 22i | Maxi 68 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.3 ft6.80 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 19.5 ft5.95 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.47 m | 7.9 ft2.40 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 4.2 ft1.29 m |
| Displacement | 2,149 lb975 kg | 3,527 lb1,600 kg |
| Ballast | 518 lb235 kg | 1,543 lb700 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 17.58 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 163 | 212 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 17.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €3,000 |
Etap 22i vs Maxi 68: the short version
- The Etap 22i and Maxi 68 are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.3 ft6.80 m ).
- The Maxi 68 is heavier, displacing about 64% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Maxi 68 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi 68 rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.