Etap 22i vs Piraya 24
How do the Etap 22i and Piraya 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22i | Etap 22i | Piraya 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.3 ft6.80 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.47 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 2,149 lb975 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Ballast | 518 lb235 kg | 1,543 lb700 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.58 | 23.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 163 | 160 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 13.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.26 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €2,300 |
Etap 22i vs Piraya 24: the short version
- The Etap 22i and Piraya 24 are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.3 ft6.80 m ).
- The Piraya 24 is heavier, displacing about 33% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Piraya 24 carries the more powerful rig (23.1 vs 17.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Piraya 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Piraya 24 rates better for offshore work (2.26 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.