Etap 22i vs Santana 22
How do the Etap 22i and Santana 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 22i | Etap 22i | Santana 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.78 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 8.1 ft2.47 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 4.1 ft1.25 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,149 lb975 kg | 2,600 lb1,179 kg |
| Ballast | 518 lb235 kg | 1,230 lb558 kg |
| Sail area | 183 ft²17.0 m² | 218 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.58 | 18.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 163 | 176 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 13.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.51 | 2.18 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.8 |
Etap 22i vs Santana 22: the short version
- The Etap 22i and Santana 22 are close in length (22.2 ft6.78 m vs 22.3 ft6.78 m ).
- The Santana 22 is heavier, displacing about 21% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Santana 22 carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 17.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 22 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.